C773 CHAP. IV. Ws own falfe Defcription of Papifls, IOUR next work being togive your Relations, firfr the falfe and then the true defcription ofa Papift, it's molt deceitful work thatyou make inboth. L In the falfe defcription you do quite pats over the. great conftitutive Caufes ofPopery, in which it is thatit differs from Apoftolical chriJlianity : And you name a few ofthe fuperftrudures or remoter differences, andcite not one Protefrant that fpeaketh thofe words, but only the. prefentArch- biJhop of cork, and as you fay, thevulgar con- ceit : And you are ordinarily careful, in every Paragraph, toput infame one word, by the difowning of whiçh you may difown the fentence. But, i . Is it not a meer deceiving trick to word your own Accufations fo in the Proteftants name, as youknow you can eafilyefr plead,Not Guilty?May not one alter fome one word in every Verfeof any Chapter in the Bible, and then proteft, that not one ofall thole Verfes is in the Bible ? . So ifthe Printer have, fome Errata in each Leaf of your Book; may you not proteft that not one Leaf of it is yours ? 2. And is it not deceitfully done to appeal to the Vul- gar as theAccufers, that thus charge ' you, when you know howvain it is toexpet, that,. (how found foever their judgments be) the Vulgar íhould frate anyContro verfles fo exaily, as not to mils it in a word or more; when they hit the fenfe? And youknew how hard it is to difproveyour For who than judgewhat is theopinion. of
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=