14 Aph. 5. in pan442 cui- busdam non volt hoc bonrtnr, pod ejt zita ¿eterna dieitur cos babe- re odiovel re,oro- bare. Tho. parr. ). q::.23,arr.3. ad e}ln:u eiChainofPrinciples. then Leah. He loved Leab perhaps lets then he ought , furely lets then he did her filler, and in that refpect is faid to have hated her. That to the ikmanes concerning Efau forne interpret in . proportion to what is there faid con- cerning Leah, and among the refs A- quino. God (faith he) fowth all men %n ais much as be T illetbfomegood to all ; but in omuch as he lothnot trill to all men the chief good, viz. eternal life, he islaid to hate and to reprobate them. 9. 3. Fourthly His purpofe was to deny unto the non-eleEE that fpecial grace, which brings infallibly toglory thole whomGod bellows it upon. No creature can challenge effe&uai grace at the hands ofGod as a due debt ei- ther to his nature or to his labour. There be many that (peak and write of God fawcily as if he were bound to give this and that and the other grace, even where they can produce no pro. mire by whichhe bath made himfel_f a debtour. I cannot but commend the zeal
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=