[ '-48 ] foie, the prevailing Part had condemned It. At ./1ntioch the Bifl~op and Monks fought it out to fo much Blood, that the Monks Carcalfes could have no Gl;ave but ·the River Orontes : At Con– ft antinopla and Alexandria the Matter oft was'liccle 'better. Are thef~ things indifferent or jefiing lV!attel's offmall Infirmity? · . 5. And the ;eh General Council Conft. 2. was thought longby a great Part of the Church to have contradicted the 4th de tribm Capitulis, and was fo much difowned, that evenVenice,Liguria,Iftria',&c• . renounced the Pope and Rorrian Primacy ·for . Owning it, and chofe a Patriarch at AquUeia to b~ the Primate inftead of Rome; which long continued, till Sergi'IU reconciled them. · · : 6. And ' that Concit, 'Trultfl.num ' called f?.!!.ino– Stxtum which you own as the fame · with the fifth, is difowned by the Roman Party to this day, and accufed by them to have been.Mono– ~helices, (Vid. Binnium) And yet faid to be the fame·Men who were the Second ConfJ. Councih An_d fo they make that Second alfo to have been Monorhelites. · · - · 9· And the next, Con/f. Third were condemned .bY the Seventh General at Nice, as heinous Sin– ners for condemning Church Images , and even .flelvicus, with other Lutherans , ·call it Synodum iconomachicam quam Oecumenicam dici voluerunt• .A.nd I think that the Church· of Rome difotvneth . the Boet:rine both ofit ~nd the Second of Nice, which ha~h a'greed that Chriffs Body is not fleih in Heaven. I · · · Now I would know while the[e Councils ~hus anathematized each other' 'or lamented tbe~r own form~r ~rfO+~ , qs Vo~iog qy ~,~ar .· pr Miftake~ .. · .. . an~ (· . . ; . . '.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=