[291J I, Mofes, ye C'tt!Jnot be faved ? And yet did patt! rail when he faid, Beware of evil-rvork§rs, beware of Dogs, bew~re of the Comcifion? What Sett cannot eafily without a DoCtors degree thus difpute ?· You are all da-mned that be not of our mind or Se[f. I But the Devil hurts thofe moft whom he leafi af.. frighteth. . . . I • .Anf. · z. What 1fwe put th1s to w1fe men to · teU us, r. How be can prove that all the Chri– .ftianWorld agreed to the Compa&s that bring us under thefe helliih confequences. I provoke him again to anfwet my proof againll: T~rret, that they, were the CompaCts but.-ofone Emptre ? 'l. •. How proveth he that we 'Brittains are under fuch CompaCts, when our Ancefiors ( and the Sr;ots) renounced Communion with the Romanifts.? 3. If our Ancefiors after turned to Popery or Cburch.Tyranny, how proveth he that we are any more bound to fin as they did, than iLtney l1ad turned ro Arianifm or Turcifm? when Ez:.e~· - 18. & 33· fpeak for the clean contrary. 4· What if we prove that Chrifi: hath himfelf given the Church in the Sfriptures, an account of his. ·own Imfiitution of Church-Form and Go– vernment, as much as is necelfary to its Eifence, Unity and 'Salvation, and that all altering Corn– pads contrary to this are diabolical: Will Chrifi: damn us for not breaking his Laws, and ferving tQe Devil ? Is it the fm againft the Holy Ghoft, and unpatdonable, mat· to defpife Chrift's Laws, and not toobey t,he Devil ?• . 5· What if we prove to him that the very , Species of his Prelacy·, and fpecially of a Supreme Catholick lttrifdiction is condemned by Chrift, and Treafon againft him? Are we Trayrors for not being Traycors? U :z. 6 Whac· ·
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=