[ j46 ] many Foreign Kingdoms have aLegiflativeRegent power over any o~her King and Nation which g~ve them not that pewer by a voluntary Sub· jedion. · : , All .thefe denied ·Dottrines you own, pag. 28. l. 7, 8, &c. p. 24,1 2,5, 26, 21, 23, ig, Ij, 14, i5. · My Reafons againft the firft are fo many before repeated, that I muft not again do that which is fo oft dorie. Prov:e you a Univerfal Humane Po– lity ( by Kings or Clergy ) and I will eaGly prove that Arifrocratical is worfe thanMonarchical, and lefS practicable: And ifyou think Popery ·im unfit Name for it, I will prove it AntichriftiaH, .as the Treafonableclaim of Chdfts Prerogative may be fo called. · · The Second Error falls with the firft : For ·Le– gillarion is the moft Eifential part of Soveraign power. · Your Third denieq Opinion I hope all Prote.. ftant Kings and Kingdoms will continue to re– nounce. And feeing you know that this whole Kingdom is Sworn againft it, (even all Foreign Spiritual and Ecclejiajl-ical :']urifdiElions as well as· " Civil,) in the Oath ofSupremacy, ( befides the ma.. ny Oaths againft alteration of Church and State .Government )' I hope you would not have the Na– tion ftigmatized with the brand of PpRJURY. If tne Law for raking the 01th of Supremacy be repealed, the Law of God againft Perjury is not repealed. · And' whether it be Treafon in it felf againft King and Kingdom, to fet up the claim of a Fo· reign power over them, .without their confent, the Judges know better than I. But I know that there be fome wife men that cannot yet prove K;. 'James
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=