[ )24 ] . I anfweri By your way it wiil follow, that it .muft have one Vniting Specifying Hurnane Sove– raignty Civil ancf Eccle(iaffical. If Aaron be down • .fo is nqt th~ Sanedrirn, Civil or Prieftly. Chrift plainly ·offered to continue them in one Vilible Body, by his choice of twelye and fevemy. And it is an Arifrocratical Univerfal Jurikiiction that is as bad as the l'v1onarchical. 2. Chrifc was not a Priefc according to the Oi·der of .Aaron, but of Melchiz..edeck. 3· Chrift: is \.lniver{al King as well ·as Prie~ ; and bath National Kings under ·him fuprerne :Therefote his being King or Priefc in lfrael, would not e.xcl11de the nec:effity of a fopreme King or Frieft under him. And if Ifrael was the Catholick. Church in Type or Infancy, . it would follow that it alfo mufc hav~ one fuch Head. · ·§ IV. Toofew Protellants have fufficiently an– fwered the .Papills Argument fetcht from the in· fiance of the Apofilt!S, viz:-. "The.College of ·A– , pofrles (Peter called Primm) were one Arifio~ '~ cratical Governing Power over the l1niverfal " Church : Ergo fuch a Poliry was inllituted by '' Chrifi. And Chrifi never revoked 'tbis inllitu– " tion• . Governmerit as well as Word and Sacra· . ' ~'. ments, is an ordinary work w be continued~ '' And not as Miracles, Writing ~cripture, Wit~ " neffingwhat they faw anq heard, the ext'rf!ordi– cc nary part of the Apofiles VVork. Ergo in ~.his " chey have Succelfors. · · .. · · ·· · This is the plaufiblefi ofall ArgHmems for ;an , Univerfal Jurifdiction• . I 'have D1e~·ed y9u how it prevailed w·ith Biiliop puni'ng and other New. Chvtrch-men ( I am not ' \\'illing to fay, The pew. Chlfrch.) ·· · · · · ' · How·
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=