their Councils abridged, but judgment and execution where their Law is in force. 5. That the Henricianherefse is one that is judged fuch by their Councils. 6. That therefore not only all ProteltantKings,but allPapifts that are for the fafe- tyandpower ofKings againft the Popes pretended power of condemning and depofing them,are Hereticks tobe exterminated and burnt (by many Canons.) 7. Therefore Kings are beholden to the Proteftant reformation (difabling the Pope to executehis Laws and Religion) for their Crowns and lives. 8. That when ever any King or others fet, up Popery and the power of their Laws and Councils in a Kingdom that is reformed, the fubjeíts are prefently dead men in Law, being to be deftroyed as Here- ticks, (though Policy or want of power may hinder the execution.) 9. emu. Whether it be lawful for any King (or in his authority) fo to de- ftroy his Kingdom, or to make all (or the generalityof) his fubjefts dead men inLaw? Io. Whether by theft Laws the Pope and his content- ingBithops have not publithed themfelves to be hoffes Region et Regno- rum, if not human generis ; and are not fo to be efteemed ? § 199. Note alto that D. Heflin, in his Certamen Epiftolare againft me, anfwereth, that it is not Kings but temporal Lords that are mentioned in this Council; and that he and Bithop Taylor, and Bifhop Gunning, and Bifhop Pearfon in their difpute publifhed by Terra or 7ohnfon, and others before them, have maintained that thefe Canons were but propofed by Pope Innocent, and ,not confented to and paffed by the Council. But to the firft It is clear 1.that by Domini Temporales Councils ordinarily mean Emperors and Kings as well as any others. z. That the words of the Council are exprefs [' ea'dem nihilominus lege fervard circa cos qui non ha- 'bent Dominos principales.] And to the 2d. I anfwer i.The Church ofRome actually taketh this for one of their approved General Councils, and will not be beholden toour Bithops for their friendly favour and excufe:And therefore it is all one to us whether the Council confented or not. z. Mr. Henry Dodwel in his late confederations how far Papifts may be crafted by Princes, &c. pag.: 67 & pag. 174 &c. bath fully anfwered all the reafons given by theft Bithops (as Terret did in part before3)and hath added abundant proof that thefe Canons were patted in that Council. t . From the Council at Oxford where Stephen Laughton himfelf was. 2. FromMat. Paris who is alledged for the contrary.3-FromGregory 9th's decertals.4.From the cafe of iohn Blunt eleltBithop of Canterbury recited by Mar. Paris an. 1233. 5. From Otto thePope's Legate. in M. Paris an. 1237. and that London Council.' 6. Fromthe Popes Letter to Otto an. 1238 in MParis. 7. From Hono- tius the 3d's condemnationof Rich. de Marifco Bithop of Durham. 8. From P. Clement the 5th's Bull for King Philip the Fair. 9. From the Council of Tarragon. lo. From the Council at Vienna under Clement 4th. i. From the General Council at Lyons under Gregory. t otli. r z. Frottnite 397 ea
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=