( 351) ty by which we believe ; but becoife through the Power and Will ofGodfo Covenanting with us, Faith ap prehendeth Chrift with all that is in him. ;it qualitatis opere quo cred- miss ; propterea rod ex Da jic nobifcum pacifcentie turn Potentia turn voluntate Chri- p.m cum omnibus vex ipfi in- fant fides apprebendit. ro../144 . *.r Ence I conclude 1. That be that fball fay that the word .1.1 jufiification in Scripture containeth fanaffication force- times , and fo that our own holynefs is the very matter of our luftification, and that we are juftified fo by it as thecaufe, mate- rial or formal, thould fay no more then Beza did allowof : which yet I sever fpake or wrote. Yea he thinketh that thofe two famous Texts, ,Rem. 8. 30. Whom he called, them be itsflified, &c. and Tit. 3.7. are thus meant. So that according to Beza, luflification in thefe Texts hath two parts, Remiflionof fin, anti Sanaification ; our Relative and Real cleanfing. If I had Paid fo , how unqueftionably would it have been carried that it was Popery ? though the Controverfie be but about the word , and not the matter. 2. Bez,1 here , though he ufe the word Inftru- merit , yet fo explaineth it that he manifefteth himklftomean the fame as I do; for he defcribeth it to be a right Condition, and its intereft in luffification todepend diredly on the will of the Pro: mica. Z 3 IS. Mart;
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=