;6a Wbaß erreurs are itstollerable. inroljc, able ? Yet as long as it is c -rta r that filch a difference ,there is , and that ac cordingly men ,ntr/t do ; cloth it not rather concern both parties to fearch after it , and praóiife as far as they can difcern , than to call away Reafon, ,becaufe there is a difficulty in ufi'ig it aright ? Jail thus the Papilts do with us about the like notion of fundamentRls or efenti.ls of Chriftianity ; They call to us for a jut} enume- ra;:tion of the fisndamen:Rls, and becaufe they find fo much difficulty there, as may find words and work for a perverfe wrangler, they infult as if they might therefore take either R1i things- or no- thing to be cfentials , and of neceffìty s As if Chriftìaxj,ity had no conflitutive effentiall parts, and fo werentlirg. And when they have all dose they are forced themfelves in their wri- ting; todifiinguilh the fndarnental,s,effentialr, and ant-'erfally neccfiry points from the r.eft, (as Da- uenp rt, Crf c r , el1ar i e, Hclden tc. do.) And firth it not then concern them as much as us, to know which they be ? What if it be a hard thug to r' numerate jufl howmany bits a man may eat, and not be a glutton? or how many, drops a man may drink and be no drunkárd ? or juf what meats and drinks mutt be tie d , to avoid ex- ee s in quality? or juft what fort of ffuf 3 or fi!Iks or cloth or falhions may be ufed without excefs ita apparel-? will you thence infer that men may eat and drink any thing in quantity.and qua-. lity, or efe nothing? or that he may wear erns thing, or mutt go naked ? Whit if you cannot j,uftiy enumerate what herbs or roots or drugs are wholforzc and what are unwholfome ? which ._. -._.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=