a;.,;;sÇC' TTT3dä' S CHAP. V, Ordination by Ach as the Englifh l're- lates, not ece auto the Beingof the e,57fflnl 'y. Se&. T. \ Havemade this work unnecef `` fary by the two former Chap- kw,:,.- rSb ` Cers : For i; , oOrdination beof 1 Necefìity to theBeing of the ^ cN Minif}ry, nor an uninterrupted `' é Succeffion Necefiar then doubtlefs an Ordination by thefe Prelates -in Specie is not Neceffary atprefent, or as to fucceffion. But yet exabstndati I add. Se&. 2. Argument a. Ad homirenm,I may well arguefrom the Conceffion of the Englith Prelates themfelves and their moll zealous adherents ; And their judgements were r . That fuch a fucceíli.on as aforefaid ofright Ordinationwas not ofNeceffity; And for this they that write againfl,the Papiils do commonly and confidently difpute. Se& 3. Andz. Theymaintained that the ProtePtant Chur- ches that had no Bithops were true Churches, and their Mini- fters true Miniflers, and fo oftheir adminifirations. This was fo common with them that I donot think a diffenting vote can be found, from the firft Reformation, till about the prepara- tions for the Spanifh matchor little before. Se&.4. I have in my Cbrißian Concordcited at large the words ofmany,and the placesof the writings ofmore, as z. Dr. Field, z. Bifhop
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=