Baxter - BT763 B397 1658

( 1$7 ) on; that you need not contend]'.elnfcr. i. I would you had told me wherein I fo come off For I know not of a word. If you mean in that I now fay,obedience isno condition of our firft attaining juttification, but only of the continuance of it, &c. I Paid the fame over and over in my book, and left it fhould be over-lookt, I put it in the Index ofdiftin&ions. If you mean not this, I know not what youmean, 2. But ifexplicationof my felfwill fo mollìfie and prevent contending, I fha11 be glad to explain my felfyet further : Yea, and heartily to recant where I fee myerror. For that which you defire , f demon- prate that its By love , andThrò cgh love &c. I have an- fwered before by diftinguifhing of the fenfe of By. and Through : and in my fenfe I have brought youforty plain Texts in my book for proof of it which thew it is no new Do- Ctrine. To your argument from Rom. 4, Where you fay that Abra- hamsjuflification it h atternof all others, I conceive that an uncouth fpeech , flra a to Scripture for pbrafe and proper fenfe, though ina large fe tolerable and true Certain I -am that Paul brings F.ibrabì vs example to prove that we are jultifiedby faith without the woìks of the Law; but as certain that our faith mull differ from Abrahams, even in the effenti- als ofit : Wemull believe that this 7efcss is he, or we (hall dye inourfins ; which Abraham was not required to believe. Our faith is an explicite Affent and Confent to the Mediators Of- fices, viz. that he be our Lord and Saviour, and a Covenant- ing with him, and givingup our felves to him accordingly : But whether Abrahams (and all recited in Heb. i i.) were fuch, is queftionable. Toomuch looking on Abraham as a pattern feems to be it that occafioned Çrotiuf to give that wretched de- finition offaith, (flnnot. in loc.)that [ it is but a higheflimation of Gods power and rrifdom, andfaitlf,fulners in keeping his protni fcs, &c, ] ,(yet I know he came fhort alfo of defcribing that faith which he lookt on as the pattern.) My fiat anfwer was that 1 exclude alfo any a f faire co opera - tion ; towhich you fay, [Why do weflrive at words, &c.] I fee that mens concevings are fovarious, that there is no hopes that we fhould be in all things ofone mind. Becaufe I was loth Bhz to

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=