Cz) go.+3ei, as confiitutingthe condition of life, [Re that believetb fl.,all not ferlh : Repent andbe converted that your fins say be blotted otat, ] This is inour felves materially, and not out of us in Chrift. , Mr.W. z. Iffariifa51ioat to Divine Juflice were not given or coifedby any thing in Hi but by Chrift alone, then Evangelical rightcoasfssefs t : in Chrift alone. But ° Ergo without blood no remiion. Aloft. Your proof of the confequence is none ; but worfe then ftlence. B.efides thefatisfaCtion of Juftice and remiffion of fin thereby. ; there is .a fubfervient Gofpel righteoufnefs , as is proved, and is undeniable. (Mr. W. 3. If Evangelical righteoufinert be in cur filves then °perfeft rigbteoufnefs u in our f lves. But tbats solo. Ergo. Anfw. Still you play with the ambiguity or a word,snddeny that which befeems younot todeny , that the fulfilling of the condition [Believe and Live] is a Gofpel- righteoufnefs ,. par, ticular and :: fubfervient and.imperfeet. The :aints have an In- herein rigbteoufnefs, which is not Legal: therefore it is evange- lical. Ifyou fay, its no righteoufnefs , you renounce the con - fiant voice of Scripture. If you fay, it is a Legal righteoufnefs ' imperfect, then you fet up Juftification by the works of the Law,( the unhappy fate:of blind oppofition, to dowhat they intend toundo.) For there is no righteoufnefs which loth not jtifiifle ormaku righteous in tanttem and foyou would make men jufiified partly by Chrifi, and partly by a Legal righteouf- nefs of their own, by a; perversedenying the fubfervient Evan- gelical righteoufnefs,.without any caufe in the world, but dark- nefs, jealoufie,and hurnoroüs contentious zeal. Yea more then fo, we have no works but what_ the Lawwould damn us for, ere we judged:by it. And yet will you fay ; that faith or in- herent righteoufnefs:is Legal and not Evangelical ? a Ifevangelic 1 righteoufrefs Were inosarfelvesand did
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=