AnfW . T . Still the queffion is wanting in the conclufion. What a packof Arguments are here? 2. Do you b lieve in your confcience, that Chrift is preíented and reprefented in the Supper only as dying ? Mr.W. Argument 9. If We have Redemption and remiton of fini through faith in his blood, then faith ai jtaflifying fbosild only lookupon that : But We have redemption and remron of tint by hks blood, Col. T. Anfw. Here's one Argument that hath the queftion in the concluton. But i. I deny the confequence of the t.Major, as not by Chriflians to be endured. The [ only ] followeth not Though_we muff be ¡unifiedby his blood, 1 have proved be- fore, that we are alto ¡unified by his Refurreéion, Obedience, Interceffion, Judgement,&c. 2. Moreover the confequence is falfe on another account Juftifying faith , that is, Faith the conditionof Juftification muff look at more in Chrift then that which purchafeth Redemption. It juf}ifieth not effi- ciently, nor of its own nature, but theProtnife juffifiethwith- out faiths co- efficiency; only it makes the condition fine qua non : and this it may doby another Aft of faith, as well as that which apprehendeth theRadom. ;. The [ quajufíifi; cans] I have fpoke to : a cannot here properly refer to the nature of the faith, but to the Benefit. And fo faith qua jufl ificant, is neither this ad, nor that aft, nor anyaft ; but L qua juJirficant J noteth only its refped to Jufification ra- ther then to Sanctification, or other benefits.As when I kindle a fire, I thereby occafion both Light and Heat, by putting to the fewel. And if you fpeak of that a6t of mine [ qua calefa- cient or qua illuminana ] this doth not diftinguifh of thena- ture of thead, but ofthe Refpea that the fame Ad bath to, leveral effeâs or confequencs. c.1/r.W. Argument Io. IfChrijfonly at crucified-be theMe ri:orioua carefe ofour Redemption and 7uffification,. then Chri fi crucified is the onldoijell offaith a Ju(iifjing. But- - --Ergo.. eInJW..
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=