(33°) Ashy. Ttue But it follows not that either Obedience is aza Effential part of faith or fubje&ion to Chrift as King jultifieth as immediately as receiving him as Saviour or Priest. Tonrt in ohe°Truth fa 6r I's to be confidered, r . Whether thefe words anfwer to Va- ledict. orat at B. pag. 191. [ Nothing but the fatsfaEtion of Cbrifl, ra that which our Diviner call the matter ofour 7uflifica'. ;ion, or the Righteoufnefr which rue muff plead to cAcquit us in yudgemrent. j And it is Paid Rom.3.z5, through faith in his Blood, and km. 5.9. by his Blood , Do not prove Chrifts Deatheither the foie or chiefObject of faith as Jullifying; and how this Rands with Aphorifm of Jufttfication, Thef66. and its Explication. z. Whether the words, Luk;1 z. 14.. impart not a dif claiming or denial of a Title to judge , and fo your anfwer be not infufficient, pa .276. which feems to fí'.ippafe a Title,and only a Sufpenftonof Exercife in that irate of Humi- liation. 3. Whether if Magiftrates be Officers of Chrift as King, by Office they benot in his Kingdom, and fo Infidel Magi- R ates in Chrifts Kingdom,contrary to Co/.1.14. q.. If it be maintained, That Chrifl diedfor every Child c f Adam conditionally, It would be well proved fromScripture, that the procuring of fuch a conditional Law or Covenant, was the End or Eifel of Chrifts death ; and whether the fo. Interpreting Texts that (-peak of his dying for all, will not ferve for Eva1ons to put by the Arguments drawn from them to prove Chrifts Satisfa&ion aad Merit, proper to the Ele&. For if theymay beInterpreted fo, He died toprocure the conditi- onal Covenantfor every one,this may be alledged juftly;thenyou canprove no more thence, for that is the fienfe; and then we cannot prove thence, he died loco noffro, era.It is a matter of rrìuch nsomentaand needs great Circumfpeetiox. Toros. Si?
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=