to'be wholly his ; even his Difci,pies; and- Subjects as well as pardoned ones. Fifthly Yea the very bread and wine ea- ten and drank do fignifie our fpiritual Union and Commu- nion with Jefus, who is pleated to become one with us, as that bread and wine is one with our inbftance. And furely it into Chrift as our Head that we ante United, and not only as dying for us : and as to our Husband, who is molt dearly to be loved by us, an¢ is to rule us, and we to be _fubjec4 to him,being made boneof his bone, and flelhof his flefh; Ephe. 5. z;,24,2 ,3© Sixthly, We are to do it as in remembrance of his death, fo alto in expectation of h;s comming, which will be in Kingly Glory, when he will drink with us the fruit ofthe Vine new in the King- dome of his Gather-. Ob .á. But Chrift Both not pardon fin in all thefe refpects. Ai/w. Firít. But in the Sacrament he is reprefented to be be- lieved in entirely in all thefe refpects. Secondly, And hepar- doneth as King, thoughhe merit it as a facrifice. And as his Sacrifice Psnd Merit are the caufe of all that following, fo there- fore it is fpccially reprefented in the Sacrament, not excluding but including the refl. Thirdly, Believing in Chrift as King and Prophet,even as his offices refpett his Honor and our fand i- ty, may be as truly the condition of our Juttification, as belie- ving in his blood. 1ó1'r. Blake.. As the [pmt of God gullet faith, fo it mußgo ;'o God for propitiation and Pttonement. But the Holy Choff guidi aith to go to the bloodof Ciorififor at tonement, ftom.3.2 5 5.9.60.1.7- I 7415.1.7. Reply.Concedo totum: Theconclufion canbe but this[therefore faith mußgo to the blood of Chr:ftfor attonement ]Who ever gnefioned this I But your Thetis which you fet at the Head of your Arguments, was [Faith in 0h,91 qua Lordcloth notjx9i- f e, ] which is littlekin to any of your Arguments. But in the explication, you have here, at laft, the term Ony, and therefore I may take that tobe fuppofed in the Argument; But then with that Addition, I deny your Minor. The texts mentioned fay nothing to prove it. Rom. 3. z5. hathno only in it, nor any thing exclufive of the other acts of Chrift : And if it had, yet it would not follow 1 that
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=