cienteff as favouring Arrianifm,(almoll like Sondiits rit ià° Pelfor Philoflorgius ;) and is fain to go to the [Major Vote ofthe Nicene Council c the proof,] that moff of the an- cients were not really ofthe Arrians mind. Da/Lew bath told you more of the Fathers differences, and unfatis- faaory expofitions. XXX. He confëffeth all the Scripture to be Gods my fallibleword, yea his Doctors have of rj erted itsfugciency ors a Divine Law ; and yet his pretenfe of its Infoficiency without Traditional fupplement, is one of the Pillars of his Kingdom. The fecond part needs no proof: For the firff, the elder Popes oft affert it ; And the School-men in their Prologue to the Sentences (Scotus, Durandus and many others :) But when Reformers confuted them by Scrip- ture, they found that would not ferve their turn, (as. Micaiah. of Ahab, it prophet'ed not good of them but evil.) And fince then, they cry up the Church and Tradition, and, deprefs the fufficiency ofScripture. Even Card. Richlieu pag. 38. confeffeth ["As for us, ":we affert no other Rule but Scripture, neither ofano- ther fort, nor total : yea we fay that it is the whole "Rule of our falvation, and that on a double account " both becaufe it containeth immediately and formally "the film of our falvation ; that is, all the Articles that " are necefary to mans falvation, by neceflityof means ; "and becaufe it mediately containeth what ever we " are bound tobelieve, as it fends us to the Church tobe `.` infdruäed byher, of whofe infallibility it certainly con- " firmeth us.] Here the fumofour Religion is granted. At the Council of Bafil Ragurius's oration (Bin. 2 p9) with [ .,That Faith rand all things neceflary to falvation, 'c bdth[matters: fbelief and p dice, are founded in the ;r literal z
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=