( 13 ). ly. 4. Either you fpeak true orfare of the learnea'eff of the EnJliJh Clergie : It falfe, it is an ill flicker for your other Falihoods : If true, what regard fhould we have of the judgment of fuchClergy-men, as declare their "Vent and Cogent to all things contained in and prefcri- bed by the Book of common-Prayer, and Articles of Reli- gion, and yet di f o wn the Rubriél , and believe Tr:, n;u-- . fiantiation, and adore theEuc-hari/l as Chri f s Body ? Why do younot call fuch : the Roman Clergie, rather than the Englifb - Clergie, if they differ from you but only in a want of boldnefs to "determine the manner, while they ac- knowledge the thing? What if a Bifhop Bramhall will have the Pope to bePrincipiumUnitatis, and take Gro- tii s to beofthe mind of the Church of England., (who would have Rome to be the Miftrefs Church, and the Pope theUniverfal Governour, according to the Canons of Councils,even the Council of Trent)) mull we there- fore floop to fuch mens judgment ? Or might you not as well tell us, that Caffander, or Mileteriw, yea or. Beliarmine, were of your mind.?' Andwhats that to us ? Y r fecond Affertion is [if our Saviour would have left 7 his facred Body andBlood, inslead of all the sacri- fices of Sheep andOxen, under the 1119faical Dipen(ati, ois, to le offered up by chriffian Priefts, and to he fed up- on by the Chriflian People, it would have been- a favour worthyofhis exceive love to mankind, by reafon of the in- numerable benefits, Vii" c. Anfw. i. If he had only left its his Body and Blood, he had not deceived all mens Senfes, nor impofed- anyCon- traditions Q.r our Faith, 2. If he had -done fo, his choice would have taught us to take it for a benefit, becaufè his Wifdom is ftteff . to difcern, and to denominate it. 3. To
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=