[Z 70] happy dales of good 7heodofius ? But all this ig yet tittle to what the fame man faithofBithops in his laft Oration de Epzfcopis, Vol. z. too (harp and large to recite. Perhaps it will bePaid, that it was the Macedonian or 4rrian Bifhops that he meant : So one Papift was not afhamed to an- fwer me, when the whole fcope of his writing fpeaketh the contrary, that he fpake of the Council at Conftantinople, and other fuch, and exprefly faith inhis Epift. 59. w Sophroniiu, Fag. 816. f eos inveneritis non ob fidei daFtrinam, fed ob privatas fiYnultates inter fe diftratos C'7 divefos, quod guider); ipfe obfervavi. But fome will fay that he was wrongfully cart out by that Council of Conftantinople,and he fpeaketh but of thar,or that injury made him fatyrical by exafperation. But . The places cited thew that he fpeaketh not of that Council only : And Epift. 55. Procopio pag. 814. he faith ( refuting to come to a Council ) egofi verafcribere oportet hoc aninofum, ut Omens .Epifcoporun Conventumfugiam : quoniam nullius concilii finemTatum &fanftum vidi,nec quaddepul- fionemmalorumpotius quam acceifionem& incremen- t-am habuerit:pertinaces enim contentiones & domi- nandi cupidrtates (neme gimpgravem&moletum exillimes hgc fcrzbentern) ne :Xis quidem verbis explicari queant, citiufque aliquis improbitatem arccffto °, duns aliïs judicem fe prabet, quam ut aliorunimprobitatem conpriryi.iAnd that injury made Gregory inja ions is an infurious conjecture, feeing all his endeavours in there bufineffes were for piety and peace : And it was partly for his fpeaking for the Peace ofthe Church ofAntioch, (whichhad long had two Bifhops, Paulinus and Mcletittt, and Flavian, sa who had taken an oath not
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=