698 / 846
AP
P
END
1
X.
Iolumb.I.
Except.
to Seat.
z6.
Pag.
47. Speaking
of
fame under
the Name
of
Epifcopal Divines
faith,
that
they withdraw the People from obeying their Paftors,
by
pretending
a
Neceflìcy
of
Epifcopacy,
&c.
and partly inflil into
them (uch Principles
as
may
prepare
them for
flat
Popery
;
and yet in the next Page 48. faith,
that thole
fame
Men do
themfelves
(viz.
Mr.
Cbifenball
againft
Vane,
Mr.
Waterboafe
for.
Learning, Zealous
Men
for Epifcopacy) publith
to the World what a pack
of
notorious, ignorant,
filly
Souls,
or
wicked unclean Perlons chofeare
that
are
turnedPapifts. How now
can Mr.
Baxter call
thole Men that
fo publi(h, &v.
faithfulFriends to
Rome?
pag.
64
See
howUncharitablenefs
betrays
and
accufes
it
felf
in
its bufy
Acculations
of
others; and mutt
juttify
them
per
Force
of Truth
when it would condemn.
Reply
toSeEt
26.
Whywhat
is
the
Scope
of
this
your
Writing, but to
prove
that
we
are.
not
Pa-
flors? and wouldyou not then draw the People from
acknowledging
us
fuch
?
This
is
like the Man that
fwears he never fwore
in
his Life ; you blame
me with
charging
you with
what you
contend for.z.Butyou do with
as
little
Candor
as
ve-
rity
fay
that in
the
next
Page
it
is
thofe fame
Men that
I
fpeak of, when
I
purpofe-
ly
and
plainly
call thefe
[Gentlemen
of
the Epifcopal
Proteflant
Party]
as
diftinet from
the
Ca_(jandrian P,apifls,
and
as
helping
us
in
the
Difcovery
of
the
Danger. But
1
perceive
it
is
your
Delire to make Men
believe
that
I cook
them for all one. But
a
goodCaufe
needs
not
fuch
a
way
of
Defence
:
Did you think that
the learned
Do.
&or
to
whom you wrote would believe you who had myBook at hand, and could
fee
that your
Words were
falte
?
And
is
it
not
Orange
that upon
fuch a dilhonelt
Foundation you can
build fuch
a
triumphant Exclamation
as
follows,
Dee
bow
Un-
charitableneß
betrays
and
accufes
it felf,] &c.
Exception
to
Sell.
27.
Pag. So.
n.
4.
[If
thefe
that
I
difpute
withwill
Thew
themfelves openly
to
be
Pa-
pifls, and plead
that Women
or Lay -Men may baptize in
cafe
of
Neceflîty, &T.]
See, fee his
Magifterial canting
crying
out Popery upon whatever
likes
him not
:
Doth
he know whom hehere condemns for Papifts
?
Yes
he doth,
for he
tells us,
pg.
8r. that
the
;8th
Canon
Elibertini
Concilii
(and
he
tells us
right)
decrees,
that in
cafe
of
nece(fity
a
Lay
Man may
baptize;
well
an ancient Catholick Council held
under the primitive pure
Times,
whilft Perfecution yet.
exercifed the
Church;
more ancient
than the Council
of
Nice,
and whereof
Magnus Ogre
Confeffor was
a part,
is
peacht
of
Popery too, together with
us.
Enough
of
this,
I
might add
much more.
All this
within the
compafs
of
twenty
Leaves, from
pag.
4f.
to
85.
Reply to Sell.
27..
All
this
but
a
Sneer
Miftake.(whether willing or unwilling)
:
I
never took
this
Point
'alone
enough to denominate a Man
a
Papilt;
but
becaufe
ie is
a
Point
wherein the Papilts generally
hold
one way, and the Proteflants another,
I take
ic
to
be
a
fuller Difcovery which
fide
the forementioned
Perfons are
of: I
durit not
fay
that
the
Error of Purgatory,
or
praying
for the Dead, or -praying
to
Saints,
no, nor Tranfubflantiation
alone
is
fuffrcientto denominate
a
Man
a
Papilt.
But
yet I think
if
a Man
would degrade
our Mini
ters, and unchurch our
Churches;
and
all
the Reformed Churches
that
have
not
Bithops
and maintain the Romith
Or-
dination,
and Church, andyet
fay
he
is
not
a
Papilt;
your Addition of
one
of
thefe
would
further the Difcovery
;
I
am
not ignorant that
Terruhian
andothers
fpeak
of
Lay
Mons Baptizing
in
cafe
of
neceffity
(but not
for Women, though
Pamelius
would pervert
Tertullian's
Words for
that End).
Except.
to Seib.
z8.
To
give you
a
Tafte
when he
quotes Fathers
as
he quoted above the
Both
Canon
Apoflolical to
eje&
our
Bithops:
So
alto
when
he would prove
that
the ancient
Church
held
it
lawful
for Minigers to impofe
Hands
for the confirming
of
Parties
baptifed,
pag. 58.
for
Proof of
what he
faith
he pretends to but
Two
Authors,
viz.
Ambrnfi
in
Epbef.
4. and Angullin
quaff.
ex
vet.
&nova
Teftam,
mixt
:
both cer-
tainly fpurious Pieces, andthe latter the Work
of
an Heretick.
_
Reply
to
Sell.
2.8.
You
go the farther the
worfe
:
I
quoted
Bishop Downame
as
one
of
the Epifco-
pal Proteftants, to
Thew
that it
is
their
Judgment, that
Minigers ordained
without
Bishops
may
be
true Minigers
:
Now
becaufe
the
Bishop brings there
two Teltimo-
nies-on
the
by about
Confirmation and Reconciliation
of
Penitents, you do
(in
my
Judgment
not well).
a.
Feign me
to be
the
Speaker
of
chofe
Words, and
the
Alledger
of
thole Authors
when
it
was a
Bishop;
and
his
Words go cited
becaufe
a