29O VireEionsforgetting and keeping which we are under, to deal with us as Enemies by deftroying us : And this is Gods Hating , Wrath, a. W" hen we Repent, Return and Believe, our Relation is changed ; The fame Law that did con- demn us , is Relaxed and Difabled, and the Lawof Grace Both nowAcquit us; it Pardoneth--us,,it Jufti- fieth us , and Cod by it :.And fo God is Recon- ciled to us, when we 'are fuel) as according to his own Law of Grace, he is, as it were, Obliged to forgive and to doGood to, and to ufe as tons, is not all this apparently without anychange in >Od! Can- not he m Ke a Law that (hall change its Moral Aeti- on accordcng to thechange of theactionsor inclina- tions of finners? and this without any change in God ? And fo, fit fhould fo be , that a Juflified rnanfhould fall fromGod, fromChritt, from fincere Faith or Obedience, the Law would condemn him again, and the Lawof Grace would Juftifie him no more (in that flare ) and all this without any change in God. 3. If this Antinomian Argument would prove any thing, it would proveJuflifïcacion before, and fo without Chrifts fatisfaetion, becaufe there is no change in God .4. The very point, That no juf tiedmanfhall everfed:fromChriß, is not fo clear and fully revealed in Scripture, and paft all doubt from the afl'aulr of Objtelions, as that a poor foul in fuch a Relapfel eftate fhould venture his everlalling ffl- vationwholly on this.: fuppofing that he were Cer- tain that he was once`fincere.For my own part, I am perfwaded that no Roòted Believer, that is Habitu- ally and Groundedly Refolved for Chrift, and bath crucified the flefh and the world (as all have that are throughly Chrifts ) do ever fall quite away from him
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=