T H E CON 1. N `? P A B. L Chap 1. j'" jHe Keafans'of this .Writing. Chap, z. The Engli/h Diocefane Prelacy and Church Go- vernment truly dejeribed, that it may be known what it iswhich we diffentfrom. Chap 3. Cur judgement if the Hiftory of theancient Church Government, and of the rife of the Diocefane Prelacy. -Chap. 1. Thejudgement of thojeNon Conformillsnow filenced, who .166o ad dref ee hetElves to King Charles H. for the matter in Church-Govern- ment ' What they then offered, and v'hat chafe of the Authors mind now hòld, as to the Right ofwhat is before but Hiftorically related. -`-Chap..5. Concerning thefeveral Writers on this Controverfie, wherein there are fuiceent auimadverfions on fame, and fuficiesot Confcotations ofthe Cheif , who have written for the Prelacy which medint from. As i, Whitgift. 2. Faravia. 3. Bilfon. 4. Hooker. 5. Bijhop Downarrs Defence. 6. Bifhop FIall, ,..Petavius. 8.Bijb. Andrews. 9 Bi(h.uiher infamepafanes. i o.Of the Difpute at theVeilWight. I a. JohnForbes. r2. Thetwo Bookr of the -BohemianDifcipline contented ta. 13. Grotius applauded. rq.J. D. 5.M, A. de born. Spalatenfis confidered, andmuchof him approved. a6. Doe7or Hammond anfwered, viz. hit Annotations, }his,Diffirtat. agairdt Blondel, t? e. Who have written againft Prelacy. Chap. 6. It is not pleafing to God, that Cities only fhould have Bilhops, and Churches withthe Territories. Chap. 7. The"Defnitionand Reafons of a Diocefan Church confidered and conflated. Chap. 8. Whether theInfidel7erritcries or Citizens are part of a Diocefane Church Chap. p. Íf/botherconverting a Diocefsgive right to their Converterto be their Bifhop andRuler. bap, ao. That aparticular Chttrch of the ftrft or lowed teuton, met/I connt of t ur :. i t .7 ofT,ciated r ntr', a' C ,.r?nveí ;.,t . , ! fr ,,. 'n
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=