Mofes hu S etfe-deniltU. ou t of.t!1e principle of a natara!l confcie»ce. As Socra;e~ was condemned to be poifoned, for oppofing the multr- 'plic:ty of gods , reJching that therewas but one God. ln away of jullice,the natura !I Confdence ofF abritim fet him fo !hong a€ainll any oppofirion , that it wac; fa id of h.im, That you might fo~ner turn the courfo of the SNll, then Fabritius from theceurfo ofju~ice. N<~W' naturall ~on fc te ncc may put a man upon a way of fuff ·ring, , · Firll:, by the lhength of that conviCtion it ha~h of lame Truths of God, of the Equirie of them, of that Divine AuthOf~ty th~t there is in them , of th~ dependance they have upon tac- 'prJma veritP, the firft Truth , which is God himfelf. r Secondly, N4tt~,rA0 CDnfoience may be convinced ofa greater good that there is in the enjoyment of the peace and quiet ofthe mind, then in the enjoyment ofall outward comforts whatfoever ; and a greater evill in the torment of fpirir, and miferie that wili fc tllow, if any thing be done againll that _ light it hatb, then there is in all evils P 4 that
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=