of the abut and ufof the doctrine faith or in unbelief. Now it is worth our pains to confider how thefemen handle the forefaid Divine attributes. Vorfiius being e ?ot. ad c loth to admit of fuch a Predeftination as Difp. de agreeth with Gods nature, hath íhaped out Peo, páß. a nature for God futable to that Predeftina 3 z$.&c. tion which he dreamed of. Hereupon he queffioneth all thole forementioned Divide attributes. The univerfall Prefcience he hotlyoppofeth under the perfonof others, not anfwering any thing to the obje6tionsal- ledged; but for the arguments of the ortho- doic fide, thefe he confuteth with might and main, or at leafr \endeavoureth to confute them. We will give you a taft of the man. íP'ag. 32.g. lnfillibálás prorfus u. f 4n infallibleanduniverfll niverfralis omniumfuturorum præfci- foreknowledge, faithhe,ofal etanulli ufisi eft inDeQ. future events is of noufe at g 'Pag. 330. pre(cien- din God. g This univerfall tiá univerfali c'r prorfus infallibálá neceffe e¡t multa, Scripture Loca mi- and ab f lute prefcienee being dabilibusglofs forgriere. admitted , many places of Pag. 3 3 i..Abft ut Deo vel hypo- Scripturemuff needsbe wrefl- crifin, vel temeritatem argue impru ed by orange gloffs. And dentiam ejufmodi attribuamus cujuf- nodi per infallibilem illam omnium again , h Godforbid that we futurcrum prenotioncm induaà om- ¡ióuld attributeunto God any ino videtur, filch either bypocri f e,or rafh- nef, Cr folly , áu by this infallible foreknow- ledge of all future things feeemeth necefJa- rily to be fa.ltened upon him. Now let us heare whether he conceive any better of Gods Sovereintic aver the wills of men. Gal
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=