with mans debruelion. poore little entitative good, which is all the good thedamned do enjoy in hell. This (X) fophifticall evafion therefore and all others of the like fort notwithflanding, I doubt not but I may fafely fay, that the unavoidable damnation of fo many millions cannot be abfolutcly and antecedently intended by God without the grearefl: injuftice and crueltie, which may in no wife be im- puted to God. ' Plutarch Cpeaking of the Pagans, who to pa- cifie the anger of their Gods did facrifice to themmen and women, faith, It had been much better with Diagoras and his fellows to denie the being of a God, then confeflìng a God to think he delighteth in the bloud of men. Howmuch rather may we fly, It were better to be an Athcif{ and denie God, then ro believe or report him to be a (r) devourer ofthe fouls ofmen The like argument is preffed by Eulebiusagainft thole cruel and mercdlcffe Gods of the Pagans ; b Dcubtle/fe, fiith he, if there were any fvotftep or ..ark ofgoodnef je in them, for which they m-ght deferve to be called good, they wouldbe difplfed to dogo,d,anddcfirms to fave all men, they would love juflice , and take a care of men. And being- fad), 1-ow could they delight in their flaughter ? &c. Yea, he condludeth that they were ` Devil or evilfpirits, andnot Gods or goodfptrits; utique cùm Because if they weregood, they would dogood; whercuf the a bengn f enignos ac which are evil ufe to do hurt. I will therefore Phut up my fit ft fa1t omui- reafon with the Ipeeéh of Prolper; d God is the Creatour in um cupidos, deedof all men, but yet of no manfor this end, that he might tun, zero a- be damned: The realm why we are created is one ; andwhy maltom fit` we are damned, another. ntímque flu^ diofos ac de- fenfores effe oporteret, dre.c ibid. e. t ç. pag.t 53. Non bonos fed malos fi:iffe da mo- nes, ve' hie ipsá ratione confici exiftimo : Qitcquid bonum eft, prode{fe bole t; no- cere ve' ò contrarium. dP7ó/p. rd Obi t. Vincent. re!p. 3. Omnium quidem hominem Deus creatoreft: fed nemo ab co ideocreatus eft ut perirec; quia alia eft caufa na fcendi, alia pereundi. + a Plut. De luperff. prope finuni. b Eufeb. de p7æpzi.Zt. lib. 4. cap. :6. p,g. 161. E- dit.Gracol. Enimvero, fi boni vetli- glum in jis ell= effet, quamobrem bonorum ap- pellariorem jure forti- rentur, cos an Anfiver to the firrf Inconvenience inferred 'upon the decree of abfo-. late Predt°litnation and _Reprobation. A Bfolute Reprobation is (in the true .fenfe of S. Auguftine and his follow- F 2 ers)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=