of Faith. 183 have Life ; and there is a wilful Faith: Tho' he kill me, yet will I truft in him, f zithJob Choi 3 ¡Anf. There is a wilful Ignorance yet Ig- rance is a Privation and Defeec in the Un- rfianding : It follows indeed, that Unbe- lief and Faith flows fame Way from the Will, tho' not as from its proper Subjea; yet of , ciently, in as much as the Unbeliever will not apply, nor ftir up himfelf to believe, by con- idering of the Golpe], but hates the Gofpel, and the Way of Salvation by Faith; and therefore hands ab4k, and will do nothing: y. G's Expreffion cloth import the Inclination of the Will to the Duty of Believing, cloth not fay that Faith is an elicite A& u Will ; and it proves that the Will hath fome Influ ence on believing. Objet. 6. If the Form of Faith its Cordial.; nefs be in the Will, then Faith is not adequately in the Únderfianding ; b t the fill. is granted: Therefore, &c. I anfwer by the fame Argument, That it will follow, that a Man is in the Category of Incorporeal Subflances, and not adequately a Corporeal Subiiance ; becaufe the Form of a Man,tiiz. his rational Soul, is in the Category of Incorporeal Subfiances. Now look, as not withftanding the Soul of Man be an Incorpo- real Subfiance ; yet a Man in the Concrete may be defined a Corporeal Subftance ; So, notwith- Landing that the Faith as to the Form or M
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=