La. I. The Honour ofthe MariedClergie. A IJ) Ecdefiopic6ULllflJ,jet dam nol M. Hall (r tbtnft) ll'dnjgrrjf tl; fo a1th11 l6111 bath grut<r f•rcethellh<ft~ppo{ethit tobll1!t. So he. P!a'oly, my ~efurc:r ~nows notwhat he fairb,elfe hewouldnever rh m palpably ple1d again !I hi!nfe.t, For, .w~at ever thi, g was there in all the conflirutionsof his Church, more lubjeCt eo vatrauon, than the Jegalllbppurarioa ofrhe forl!idden degrees? which was a long time confined eo the third degree inclufively, another wh!leexrendedro che.fourth, and fometime to the fevemh. Let him herein reconcile his Pope NichoiM&Gregor), Wtth Pope InmtC<III, whereofthe one left all free chat were without rhep1le of the founh de!(ree, rheorber rellrainedall to the fevemh; And when he finds ' '" unalr<rablenes in the determination, of rhefe degrees, let himplead for an equally-farall neceffiry ofhis Eccleliaflicali continence; in rhe mean rime, let him rake it patiently to he beaten wit)1his 8 own R.ool. No divine Law rhen(hegranu) harh injoyned thisCekbJte, bur all Eccleliaflicall. Whariuhismherthan I ftid? Gndlltvtrilllpofodthk Low ofConti"'*'J; Who , the,,i! 'Thech.nh. And whr mlynot.l goon,ro alk, wh,th<~:agoodw,fiwo•ldgoiJ:- /;f.:;;;,"' f•Jn>hat her bM1hond:viUethl Flounlhrngwtll nor anfwet dm. All the prarfes of t.r.e.J.. beauty and lidolirv which aregiven to the true Church, argue Rome robe thefalfe. ''""'if".. Where:~s therefore the Prietr !hutsup rhus bravely; Andthi/Minifier,rt>ho D'oNid m•I?J !,;~;f.:r.'!. the o11< to g•iJ•-f•J the other, jbot~ld bringfome place or(e11teme to/hew the fame (which he :J,'a;,;,,"! '"' 111~1 rh•1zce to d« thewext mornirJg -ft'!r th!Greek._ ~.:l1!nd1) or tl.fo nwer 6Vo11ch fo ~~~ f.pt111'i;~r!z"t. chrifi"n # P•r•dox: He !hall under!bnd, that hts Greek Calendsarepatr. TheSpi- TheChu«h rirofGod faith, A BijbopmaJh< the Ht~lhalldofoneWifo: The ChurchofR.omeftyes, l!;,"'!t,_tt.e.eC A Bifhop III'J !lot ie the H•:btmi of #n) Wifi at •U: Whether isthis acontradiction? ~ p~;}.~: TheSpirit ofGod fayes,M•riageit howrahle amongp •U fl1t11: The Church ofR.ome ~~ ;n remo.. fay"'-, Mari1g'e ;, difho~tordk toJome. TheSpirit ofGod fay<!, 'To •v•idforsic•tion vong~ mcd•· ltt eve'lm•n ha.JebisW1fo: The Church of R.ome,like aquick hufwife, fiyes, S•me f:'rodoe " Ortkrof111e11jbaU not h~We a lrlifo, thot~ghto (Jf)OiaFornic•tton. Leemy Mafl'e-Prielt more ham !hew rhefe robenocontradiction• (which he may chan~ eo doe at theGreek Ca. ~':;.:,~. lends)or elfe grant this to be n~irher Paradoxnor unchri!han. SEct. XXIII. F.R.om eardinall Panorl!lil411,l af. ended ro Pope p;., th' Srcond,whom I ufbered D in with thi• Preface, ieto Popehimfotfi f}eo4oJdojl'et<rsC/,"! ", Piusthc foco!ld, Rr/'"'·l·•ol. 11/ursetl"" h•thjit inth41 roo"' thilthoufondJeeres. Two rh.ngsm} CJviller lnarles at in the P1oface, tWO in the authority itfelfe. My lirflrrpnifefi untruth is, that Piu1 the fecond fpake this os our ofthe Cbaire. AWltlefl'e mtfpriiion: I hope he fare in Ptlers Chaire that (jJ.>ke it, ifhefplke it nor as from rheChairr, I care for no more. Is not rhis fttffidenr ro win rcfpecH·omaCarholike Pridl? Otherwife, whether it were Stool, or Chair; or if 3 chaire, whether the Coniii\oriall, or the Parphyry chaire, wh<rrin he lies 1:-tfiJre his lirft triumph, I tan9.11t1m in Jlercorarla, it tsallonewmc. Themfclves mull firfl 3grec what ic isc<1 ·, t ,b facr. fpc•kasfrom rhe Chair, ere I can affirm chat PiNI theSecond fo fp.•ke this. Id popuiMS: c•rrt, I referred rhec!)aire corhe man, norro the fpeech: In me mean rime C. E. is E notfogood agroom to char Chaire, as Grego>J ofValence, who attribute; infallibility to aPopes fenrenct,though itbemftnrc•r• & j/Ndio. MY fecoud wrongis rhe!i:tperlarive la!hing ( (o he calls it) oforher Popes lcarnmg in cowparifon ofrhis. Icry ;,';:.~:""· himmercy, I did nor knowwhat fin it was eocommend a Popes learning; That i, nor it (I conftfi'e) that cariesaway the Crownand theKeyes : But the comparifon offended. Perhaps c. E. bath knowJ! rheChairmore learnedly furni!bed: lt mny be he thinks of Bowiface the Ninth, called before Peter de Th•nroctUi<, a Neapolit3n, •whocould neitherwrite, nor Gng, hardly onderfianding the prop(>firions ofthe Advocates inrheConiiilorie dnfomocll •• in his time, All{citiafort'D<tllill<f•/1• foil ; ;t,_., m..,. i•ipf~r'"i•, lgnorancewa•grownvaluable. Or it may be herhinksofthote ancient ferule-fingred Boy·Popes; oneofthe Bet~tdi/11 , agrave faU!er ofrenneyeereo Ppp ~ old;\ _ .. ..
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=