I '' · lleart~1reafure; .. I rAnt JIH the{e preci[e walk!rs are no hetter th4n 'their Neighbo11-rs ; ~~ the truth were ftnown, thq _ , ... t~re ,acoinpanJ of dij[embler.r 4 11nd ·A.re r~tten At . • "':,•·';. th~ heart ; Phar'ifee-lik.; t~,ey make · c!e~n thtJ ... ~ _ ot~t-Jide of tbe Cup , a~ed cendemn other:s as pro.. " rJ- • 0 ,• . phane, Ant/. then binde ,·t with as Oath ' thCJ . - ~ are · tU b~d as themfelves: ~nd jf a Projeifour flip intoan open fin, .~hen they a~e confirmed in their cen(ures, and conclude, theJ'~tre ~tt ·~ ·· ~~~~, ~e pac~ of diffemble'tts: . and now the ho1ie{\Saint (that hares !ucJ1 fins, and mourns "· " for it, ·as his greatdl: burden ) fhal have l)is 1 brothers mi[carriage daibt in his teeeh tor c- ;, :ver: But if a man might argue w.irh rhefe Cotcifh, yet cenforious foules, in' a rational way, vyhat could they aofwer? Are not they them{elves \Vor{e than the lob( eft Profeffors?. and how far fuort do they ·fall of clp!e~walk~ 1ng Chrifiians ? Should all be condemned fo~; I I I 'if" ., · the fake ot one~ · a11d fuould wee not judge according to what we fee, or can_atta\n to . ., ~he knowledge o(? Is not theTreeknown to' · , ~:\_ us by its fruits, and not by irs Roots,whichare : '< ~ invifible to us? Lord.. fee thefeVlid · boaHers • • I • ~ I I . :; ' I ' awo,rk in [earthing their own l1earts, and ex- ' ' '• a·mining their own felvet, whethrr Chrifl hee :. Cor. I 3~ . 1 I within them (as Pa:~l direGl:s ~ theCorinthians in f., · ibis y~ry. ca{e) aHd this·wil cure their cen- ., r for· ·ts, and finde them work enougl? , ~o ; for as the Eye that looks moft I • ,a lea{t wirhin , fo the moft uncha- . _t:ita · en{urer~ arc themofi emptie~ unpro- ·. ·' , · fi~able Profdfors : when as a Chrifl:ian that f1~thmqH: gra~e himfclf, j\udgech befi of o- ' · ' · ·· · thc.rs ~ I • !
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=