'92 The Reafotiablenefr acknowledg'd very prejudicial ; or on the part of thofè, who in confideration of thefe evil confequence(, and of the Ad- vantages and Bleffed Effets ofa Univet- fal Conformity,' rather chofe to defect the Separate Miniflry, than the Eftallifhed Church. The Third Argument in vindication of your People, is taken from the Caufe you are engaged in. thus, The Caufe in which the Difenting Mi- nifers are engaged, is a good and juft Caufe ; Therefore, it is theDuty of the People in their place to efpoufe it, and adhere to the fame Principle, &c. The Caufe you are engaged in, you fay, is, The preng a farther Reformation in Eccleflaftical Matters, as nece[fay in or- der to the moregeneral reaching of thegreat ends of Religion. This is the Principle the People are to adhere to, in oppofition to thofe who reckon the Churchfoperfed as to need no amendments. This I find frequently mentioned by you, and therefore I fhali endeavour, under this Argument, clearly anddiftin&- ly to fet down my thoughts upon this part of the Caufe. And it will be, 1 con- ceive
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=