of CONFORMITY. to theChriflian Church, or to the People's fouls, or, of fuch neceffity, confidering the Legal Prow faon for them, that You fhould be fo concerned to maintain the People in the aaual exercife of it, and they be fo often, and vehemently ah larmed with the fear of lofing it. And then, if in there Parifbes, where the Mi- nifter is chofen by the Votes of the People, there be no fmaller a number of Difent_ ers than in others (if fo fmall) this Both not look as if the People diffented becaufe they cannot, in the Eflablifhed may, Vote for their Minifter, but upon force other account ; and that if they were univerf- ally reflored to this privilege, this would put no flop to their feparation. And, if Parifh-Order be at all to be regarded,asYou fay it is, this Right of Voting for their Mi- nifter is all that your People can poffibly claim. For I obferve, 3. That the Conftitution can never be foordered, or fo happily contrived, that every particular Chriflian íhall be under the Miniftry of the Perfon whom He would chufe before all others. Your own People can acquieíce when they fee t (tho' every one cannot be pleafed in 53
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=