of CONFORMITY. I( I AndMr. Calainy tells us, That if they goÁbridg to another Parifb, the inconvenience is note' 547° great ; not fo great, I am fore, by many degrees, as what mull: follow upon their fetting up Separate Churches. Whence then arifes any neceffity of a Separate Miniflvy, and Separate Churches, and dif- tinec Modes of Publick Worfhip, if it be fo, that thePeople may attend conflantiy upon theService in the Eflablifhed Church, and yet neither hazard their Salvation, nor fubmit to unqualified Guides? And confequently how little doth this con- tribute to their juftification ? I have al- ready fpoken fomething on this _lrgu- ment, taken from 'Unqualified MMinifiensq when I confidered it with relation to your Own Practice ó And fo, fhall add no more here, but argue a little with you Upon what I have now laid down. If, then, this Right, we are (peak- ing of, be a Right with which your People not only may, but ought in duty to part, upon weighty Contiderations, (asI have !hewn from their own practice and your own Conceffions) why ought they not to part with it, as well in the Eflablìfbed way, as in a Separate way? Or, what Motives are there to induce them I t
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=