of CONFORMITY. therefore a fufficient Argument (by your own Confefíion) to induce Tau who carr Communicate occaßonally, to Communicate confiantly, with the Church of England ; which is the main End I have propofed in thefe Papers. Firfl, That thefe Circumfances you mention, do not attend upon Confiant Communion ; or, if they do attend upon it, they do not make it unlaraful : And that the like Circumfiances do attend upon your Occafional Communion , and your Separation. Your fenfe of this mat- ter, I Mall give you in your own words, and then (hall beg leave to examine into the truth and jufinefs of it. Confiant Communion reprefents the Worfhip of the Church of England, nor only as law- ful, but as eligible, nay, preferable; which is contrary to the inward fenfe of the wogs Moderate among the Diffenters. Confiant Communion practicaly betrays our Libere ties, in compliance with rigorous Impofers. Confiant Communionferns to intimate as if Divine i'Vorfhipwere not acceptablewith- outfach fuperadded Formalities, as are en- j oyned in the Church of England. Cone M 4 Nat 183
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=