190 The Reaf tr'ablerne, fs it, bad it been altered. And if Conflate Cornmun!on would havebeen lawful, tho' a Liturg y had been impofed ; it is lawful, tho' d(nerliyg be impofed; and tho' aForm ofPra; er be till] impofed. Either, there- fore the confiant fubmitting to fome Terms of Communion, (call them Impoft- tions, or what you pleafe) is not a practice cal betraying ofyour Liberty; and fo, con- fequently, confiant Communion is not : or elfe, It is not unlawful practically to be- trayyour Liberty, in compliancewith rigorous Impofers ; and fo, confequently, it is not unlawful to hold confiant tt Communion with the Church of England. Which foever of the Two be true, your Argument, now before us, is equally def}royed : And one of them muff be true; or, you do very ill in telling Us fo often, how ready you have been, and dill are, to comply upon forne Amendments. Confiant Communion cannot be a prallical declaration of any thing more, than that thefe Impofitions may lawfully be complied with, as being not materially finful ; and that you judge it better, upon forne Conf;derations, to comply conftantly in a lartfui aEtion, than tofèparate on this Account. This may ferve for an anfwer , alfo, to that Charge
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=