t The Rearnablenef Refentments agaìnít Communion in what you allow to tie tolerable how can they be too rigid , or too zealous , a- gainfr what they think to be intoler- able? If then, it be unlawful to appear to acquit the one ; why ilio`uld it not be unlawful to appear to acquit, and en- courage the other ? Again, Suppofing your Liberty to be invaded by thefe Im- pofitions : yet liince the things required are not unlawful (as you acknowledge) it is certainly lawful, ifnot very commendable, for you to yield up your liberty, in a fmall and lawful intlance,to theConfiderations of Peace and 'Unity. And if it bebut law- ful for you to do this, then this Argu- ment cannot proveyour Conftant Commu- :ion to be unlawful. Much lefs, if it ap- pear, upon confideration, to be your Duty fo to do. You may then, I think, be Conftant Communicants, notwithftanding any thing in this Argument : Efpecially confidering, that as there are Rigorous Impofers in the Church ofEngland ; fo, there are, and have been many, moft ready and willing, to yield up fome confiderable Points, to gain your Cono- formity. And why íhould you not thing Jour
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=