of CANFARMITY. fay, therefore, that if it be lawful for you, to ufeany fuch inyóur own Church- es, it is lawful in the Church Etablifheda And, I add farther, That your Conftarit VA Of any particularfuperadded forma- lity in your own Churches, feems much moreftronprly,to intimate, as ifDivine ¡'VorO fhipwere not acceptable without it, than fuch a Confiant Vfe ofany in the Church Efta- blifed can do. For, what youufe inyour Churches, you pretend, you ufe upon choice which implies, that you imagine it to add fomething to the acceptablenefs of the Worfbip whereas no fuch thing can be fairlygathered from your Confiant ufe of afuperadded Formality in theChurch of England ; becaufe no one can pof ibly tell, whether you confrantly ufe it, be caufe you think it moti conducing to the decencyand acceptablenefs ofpublick Worfhip9 or, . becaufe it is enjoyned by Authority,, and you think it more for the univerfal good to fubmit to the enjoyned ufe of its' than to break the Peace and ZJnity of the' Church for the fake of it. Or, If yob fay; that the Confiant ufe of form Formality in your own Churches, may alfo be, fo nterpreted;I anfwer,Then ConftantCoin- mtenionwith a Church, doth not intimate 195
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=