200 The Deafnablenef the inflitution of Chrift as defective, only in fuch Circum/lances as He purpofely negleed to determine, and left to be determined by Future Governours. This Reprefentation of Chrifi's In/Iitution is not only not unlawful, but neceffary, and unavoidable in all Religious Affemblies. And,Therefore, Conftant Communionwith the Church of England is not unlawful on this account. Betides, It is worth while to confider, whether your Occafaonal Com- munion with the Church Eftablifbed, do not as truly reprefent Chrift's Institution .s defective, as your Constant Communion can do ; only with this difference, that the one reprefents it fo, lets frequently than the other. But ífill, If it be unlaw- ful to do this (fuppofe in the Celebration of the Communion; which muff here be meant by you) twelve times in a Year, it is unlawful to do it once. And if the Communicating with our Church once ina Year, do not reprefent Christ's Institution as defecTive, I cann t fee how the Commu- nicating with it twelVe times ina Year can do it. But, what I havealready faid, to- gether with what I have obferved under the preceding Head, which., is of the fame Nature with this, I judge to be a more than
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=