of CONFORMITY. SO) than fufficient Anfwer to this Reafon a- gainft Conliant Communion. 5. And lafily, Conliant Communion., according to You, is a Confining your Charity to a Party; and a practical dif owning and condemning all other worfhipping Afemblies, And therefore, is unlawful. To this I anfwer, i . Constant Communion is not a Con- finingour. Charity to a Party. For, I dare fay, You cannot name any one tingle infiance of ChriFtianCharity, due, by the Laws of the Gofpel, to any Perfori, of what denomination foever, which a man that lives in Confiant Communion with the Church of England cannot perform as well as any of Tom, who Occafionally communicate with it. And if you can- not name any one fuch infrance, then this part of your Charge cannot be true. ConJtant Communion breaks not in upon any one tingle part of Chriftian Charity: but it is the Negleért of Gonflant Commu- nion, that hath been the defiruElicn of Chriftian Charity in the Land, and the encouragement to all Vncharitablenefs. This is a terrible circumfiance of the Neglect of Confiant Communion: but this weighs nothing with You, on one fide; whilil
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=