X04 The Reafonablenef perfuaded, that it is not his duty, his indifpenfable duty, to do it. I grant, therefore, that this, as I have explained it, is a Circumfiance of Confiant Commu- nion with the Eflablífhed Church; but then, I maintain, that is very larvful, and perfealy confiftent with Chriflian Charity ; and fo no objeaion againfl Confiant Communion. 3. I mun put You in mind again, as I have often had occalon to do, that You would have coalland) communicated with the Church of England. your felves, and would do frill, upon fotne alterations. Now ConflantCommunion would be then, as much a confining yourCharity to a Party, and a condemning all other feparate n'or (hip- ping Affemblies, as it is now. Yet, if it be unlawful now, fo it would be then. If lawful then , fo is it now. As , therefore , You have declared , that You fhould think it not only lawful, but your duty, then ; fo, acknowledge it, at leaf{, lawful now notwithflanding this Circumfance ; left You fhould accufe your felves of having refolved to do what is unlawful , if this can make Con/lant Communion unlawful. Once more, 4 BY
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=