The Realnablenef notwithí}anding this Circumflance of ït and yet Confiant Communion be rendered unlawful by Circumfiances, much more inconliderable ; and hardly founded upon any thing but Imagination. I have one Argument more toover to your Confideration , to prove , that thefe Circumfiances, fuppofing them to attend upon Conffant Communion, do not make it unlawful; and this taken from your own conceflion, that Confiant Communion was lawful, before You came to imagine that there were no hopes of f amendments ; and that the waiting time was over. p. 563. NTow, there is not one of thefe Circum(tances, but what always belonged to it, as much as now. Con- fiant Communion always betrayed your liberty ; always intimated, as if Divine ivorfbip were not acceptable without fuck fuperaddedformalities ; always reprefented Chrift's own inftitution as defeétive ;alway s appeared to acquit Eccleflaftical A./Lamers ; always was a confining your Charity to a .Party , and a di/awning other worfhipping Affemblies, li , as much as it is now. How, therefore, can you fay, that thefe Cira cumf tances are what make it unlawful ? For, If they did not make it unlawful here.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=