c 283 a " to the Lord Burleigh, of whom he " demanded, whether they defred the " taking away thereof? Theyanfwer'd, " No ; but only the Amendment of what " was ofenfive therein. He required c` them tomake a better, fuch as they sc would have fettledin the Read there- cc of. Whereupon, `c The frfl Claffis framed a new `c one, fomewhat according to the c` Form of Geneva. cc The fecond, DISLIKING it, alter'd " it in SIX HUNDRED Particulars. " The third QUARRELL'D at thefe " Alterations, and refolved on a new " Model. " Thefourth Claffis DISSENTED from " the former. " Thus, becaufe they could not agree CC among themfelves, that wife Statef- cc man put them off for the prefent, " until they should prefent him aPat- " tern with a perfe& Confent. The very Form of their Subfcription to their Holy Difcipline confirms this Account. As much Hale as they were in to obtrude it upon the World, it plainly appears from thence, it was not fully agreed and fettled among them- felves. TheFormof their Subîcription was after this manner: " This Dif -N'SHiflory " cipline we allow as a godlyDifcipline,APp`n.P6z3. " and
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=