I N D E X. flablilhed without limitation of time, p. 340. Farther e!lablilhed, p. 387. En– deavours to fupport it, p. 443· Re!lor– ed, p. 531. Abolilhed at the re!loration, P· 555, 558. Rell:ored in Scotland, p. 8os. Presbyterian plot againll: th·e parliament, p. 404. Prl!jbyterians in the alfembly of divines, and their chief patrons in the parliament, p. 97• Their feverity in inforcing uniformity in the ufe of the direcrory, p. 109. Their reply to the indepen– dents about the divine right of prefby– tery, p. 191. Their zeal to have the divine right of it eflablifhed, p. 193· Are offended at the provifo's in the or– dinance about fufpen{ion from the facra– ment, p. 199. Petition againll: the or– dinance for pre!byteries, becaufe it gave them not power enough, p.. 203. De– feat the delign of a comprehenlion for the independents, p. 206. Their reply to the propofals for a toleration, p. 207. They argue again{~ the lawfulnefs of a feparation, p. 21 r. Their high notions of uniformity, and again!l liberty of confcience, p. 212, 213. Cenfured in a pamphlet, ibid. They petition againll: fecraries, p. 22r. Are feconded by the (coli, p. 222. Petition again!l: fecraries, &c. p. 247. Their aver/ion to a toleration, p. 265. Their feparate views, p. 268. Their propofals, p. 28r. ·Counter )'Ctition of their clergy, and an .ordinance in their favour, P· 289. Their provincial alfemblies, p. 26 I, 335, &c. Their country alfociations, p. 337· A terrible ordinance palfed by ·their influence againfl blafphemy and he– refy, p. 338. Remonflrance of their .minifters againfi the proceedings of the army in relation to the king, &c. p. 361. Their farther vindication, p. 364, 'Wh£ther they are chargeable with the king's death, p. 372. Their conducr towards the commonwealth government, p. 382. They refufe the engagement, 'P• 383. Proceedings againfi them, p. 395· Their fiate under Cromwell, p. 431. Copies of teflimonials tG mini– fiers, ibid. They are enemies to Crom- ..well's government, p. 436, They are for rell:oring the king, p. 525. They are in full polfeffion of the nation, p. 531, 5t,6. Are courted by Monk, P• 542. Terms on which they would re– ll:ore the king, p. 547. Their vain ex– pecratiorts from the coun, p. 548. A oeputation of th~ir mini!lers wait on the king at Breda, p. 551. Their mini– ll:ers made king's chaplains, p. 557. They addrefs for a comprehenlion, p. 567. Ab!lracr of their fir{~ paper of propofals, p. 5t9. Their reception, p. 571. Ab– ll:rac~ of their defence of their propofals again!l: the bifiwps, ·p. 574· The be– ginning of their fufferings, p. 575. They apply to the king, ibid. Abllraa of their fecond paper of exceptions and requells, p. s8o. The king's declara– tion acceptable to moll of them, p. s8.;. Some accept of preferments, p. 584. They are in defpair upon the commons rejecring the king's declaration, p. 585. Their troubles, p. 594· Sham plots fa– thered upon them, p. 598, 647, 714, 724. Their hardfbips in the Savoy con– ference, p. 603. 'fhey defcend to in– treaties, p. 607. Behaviour of their di– vines in the conference, p. 6o8. Their hardfbips before the aa of uniformity, p. 6r4. Their conducr after the aa, p. 63 I. Their difficulties, ibid. See Non-conjormijls and Dijfenters, Prefbyteries, ordinance tor erecring them, P· 199· Prefs, orders for reflraining it, p. 33· A– bufe of it by Laud, p. I49• Prince of TFales, king's letter to him, p. 356. Remarks, p. 357· Prof1fors in the univerJity of Oxford who fubmitted to tbe parliament, p. 313. Of thofe who were ejecred, p. 316, Of thole who fucceeded them , p. 320. Their behavi011r, p. 321. See Cambridge, See Oxford. Prohibitions in the .JPiritual courts, p. 128. Protejlant interejl, union of it projecrcd by Ct·omwell, p. 499· Protejlants turned out, and papifis put into offices by king 'Janies, p. 775· Province of London, claJlical divilion of it, P• 225, l'ro-
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=