CAP. XV. gg. Elfitintattt* itthfisihe kt 145'4445V4ifIVA :144 WV-44 t M.G'sfift Argumentfor theApofafyof timeBelievers. 2. Theweight ofthis Argumenttákenfront the fins ofBelievers. Thedifference between the fins of Believers and unregenerate perfons propofed to confideration. 3. lames 1. r4,15. Therife and progreffeofLufand Sinne. 4.The fountain ofall fmne, in all perfons isLull. Rom.7.7. 5.Obfervationsclearing thedifference be tween Regenerare and unregenerateperfons in their finning , as to the common fountains of all finne: The firt. 6. The fecondofthe univerfalityof Luft in the foule by nature. 7. The Third, in two inferences: thefirf, unregenerate men finne with their whole confent. 8. The Second inferenceconcerning the raigne offinne, and raigning finne. 9. The Fourth, concern- ing the univetfall pofeffion of theSoule by renewing Grace. to. The fift,that trueGrace bears rule where ever it be. r 1. Inferences from the former confiderations. Thefirf,that in every regenerare perfon there are dicerie principles of all Morali operations. Rotw7.19.so. opened: 12. Thefecond, that finnecannotraigneina Regenerate perfon. 13. The third , thatRegene- rate perfonsfinnenot with their wholeconfent. 14. Anfwer to the Argument at the entrance propofed. Believersnever fnnewith their wholeconfent and willes. r5. M. G's attempt to remove the Anfwer. 16. Risexceptions confidered and removed. Plurality of,Wills in the fame perron in the Scripture fence : ofthe oppófition between tefh and fpirit: that no Regene- rate perfon finneswithhis full confent proved. 17. Of the Spirit and his Lufings in us. 18. The Aainggs of the fpirit inus free, not fnfpendedon anyconditions in us. 19. The fame farthermanifefted. 20. M.G's difcourfe of the firf andrecond motions of thefpirit confide- red. 21. The fame confiderations farther carried on. 22. Peter Martyrs Tefimony confi- dered. 23. Rom.7. r9.2o. confidered. 24. Differencebetween the oppofition made to fin in perfons Regenerate,and that in perfons unregeneratefarther argued. 25. Of the fenceofRom: 7. and in what fence Believers doe theworks of theliefh. 26. The dole of there confderati. ons. 27. The Anfwer ro the Argumentat the entrance ofthe Chapter opened. The Argument new formed: the MajorPropofition limited , andgranted, and the Minor denied. 28. The proofe oftheMajor confidered.Ga1.5.21. Ephef.5.5.6. r Cor:6.g.no. 29. Believers howCOB. cerned in comminations. go. Threatning proper to unbelieversfor their finnes. 3 t. Farther obieetions propofed and removed. 32. (Write progreffeof Saints intempting to finne. 33.The effeâ of Luft in temptations. 34. Difference between Regenerate and unregenerate perfons as to the temptingof Luft, O.)inrefpeaofnniverfality, (2.) of Power. 35. ObjeRions An. fwered. ;6. WhetherBelievers finne only out of infirmity. 37. Whether Believers may finne out of Malice, and with deliberation. 38. Of the fateof Believers,who iupon their finne may be excommunicated. 39. 40. Whether the Body ofChrift maybedifinembred. What body of Chrift it is that is intended. 41. Mr G. thoughts to this purpofe examined. 42. M. G. difcourfe of thewaywhereby Chrift keepsor may keep his members examined. 43. Members of Chrift cannot become membersof Satan: 1 Con6.15. confidered. 44. ofthe fenceand ufe of the word /legs. 45. Chrift takesMembers out of the power of Satan, gives up none to him. 46. Repe. rirjonof Regeneration all'erted byrise Doârine ofApotafy. 47. The Repetition difproved. 48. M.G. notion of Regenerationexamined at large and rebuked. 49. Relation between God and hisChildren indifoluble. 50. Thefarther progrefeofLuft for theproduâion offinne, it draws of,and entangles: drawing away what it Is. 51. The ditancebetween Regenerate and nnregenerateperfons in their being drawnaway by Luft. 52. Farther defctipdon ofhim who is drawn away by Luft: and ofthedifference formerly mentioned. 53. OfLofts enticing. 54.How farte this may befall regenerate men. To do finite Roma. what it inteudeth, 55. Lots concei- ving, wherein it confits. 56. Of the bringing forthof finne, and how farre theSaints of God mayproceed therein. 57. n lob. 3.9. opened: the fcopeof theplace dircovered; 58, Vindica- ted. 59.T he words farther opened. The propofition in the words univerfall : inferences from thence. 60. The fitbjeä ofthat Propofition confidered, every one that is borneofGod , what is affirmedof them: what meantbycommitting offinne. 6r. M.G. 0ppofition to the fenceof that exprellion given. Realons for the confirmationofir. 62. M.G.Reafonsagainf it, propo- fed and confidered. do. The farther Expofition ofthe word carried on : How he that is borne of God cannor finne: feverall kinds ofimpoffbility. 64. M. G. attempt to Anfwer the Argu- ment from this place. 65. Particularly examined. 66. The Iteafoils ofthe Propofition in the Text confidered: ofthe feed of God abideth: the nature of thatfeed, what it is, wherein it con- fits. 67. Of the abiding of this feed. 68. Of the latter parrof the Apotles Beaton, he is borne ofGod: our Argumentfrom the words. 69. M.G. indeavour to evade that Argument: hisexpo- , bawl
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=