( 255 ) tionof Arbitrary Rule ofwalking in Churches, on all that are prefumed to belongunto them. But to clear the things the Door propofeth three things to be debated. z.. Whether the Apoflle(peaks of diffferrnt Opinions, or ditrent 7'rac`lifes. 2. Whether the 2ule he gives be mutual Forbear- ance. 3. How far the Apofile's *le bath an Influence into thisCafe. The two firfl oftherebelong not at all unto the pre- fens Argument, and the laft is but faintly propofed and purfued, though it be the Foundation of his wholeFa- brick. The Reader, ifhe will put himfelf to fo much trouble, as tocompare my former Difcourfe with what is here offered in Anfwer or Oppofition unto it, he will eafily fee that nothing is pleaded, that may abate the forceofwhat was inliiledon 5 For indeed the Difcourfe on there things confifts for the molt part in Diverfions from the Argument in hand, whereby an Appearance is made ofvarious Arguings, and the Proof of fundry things, which belongnot unto theCafe. in:hand.. Without any long Dedu&ions, artificial Intimati- ons, or diverting Reafonings, without wrefiing the Text or 'Context, thefe things arcs plain andevident. ink them ; (i.) A Suppo[ti r ofDiffèrenees among Believers, in and) about Opinions and Prahifes, relating unto Reli- ?ggon and tiltWotibif-ofepid. Soivatiiirtfmtbetween
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=