55 8 'Ih V e emon ration oftb b eTro feme. to let palfc the authority ofc.,.n,fiwT~citiH, A ning the forme of bodily fubOanc<. And whPlaiCb,that 10DomitittturimetheBritaiwes Am>rcjt,dts-.lib.4. <•!·4· faith,They arc !tuotcd fort he eloguenceofthelatinrongue. what they were, and yetarechanged mto oThus he. Now afterward when the Empire thcr. AndThtodmt, di•l. z. ThemyOicall began ro mcline, and theLatine became cor· fignes do not Jcauc their proper nature after tuptcd by the Gothes in Italy, yet thevfe confccrauon.And ljtl•f.con. ENtJ<.The fignes th~.reof remained in matters of religion, as do temaine in the prl'f.rietyof their nature. betore,by rcafon ofthe oldccufrome,which AndW4/ftid.c•p. aIS. ed<liuered the Sacraby greater reafonflJOuld haucbccneabroga· ments of his body and blood vnto hisdifci- <ea. But now otis held laudable,yeanecelfa· pies in the fubllance ofbread and wine. And ry ro worlbippc in Latine, that is, in an vn· . P4(cba(u11, dec•rp.& [.ng. D•.c. 10. •li.u z8. knowne tongue. Bread ftrengtheneth the heart of man, and 3 Anytongucwhatfocuer, euen the La· winecomforteth,--and therfore this myfie· tltiC it li:lt, VOto thofe that Vnderlland it not: ue of our faluarion is·ri~htly celebrated in is barbarous: as Ooid in his Trifti•, faith the fame fubfiance. The like vnto this bath 11gbtly, Borb.rUihletg•[um,&c. in Englilh B Btrtr.m. AndPA[cbA(iullgatne,cap.17.•1itu thus: -.~.Therefore my fonnc when ihou comme(\ Jam hutbaTbar.w in thP. jlrangdand, to comrr.unitare of thit myfiery, open rhc Forno rn11nheremlJPuch CQnv,derflAntl. boComeof thy mind,clcanfcthy confcicnc:, Looke Chryfo{/om< and Haimovpon the 14. and giuc not thy lelfe to receiue rhar onely of the fir!lto the Corinthians. which the peece of bread containes,butthat which faith rcceiuetli, becaufethat in Chri(! iscontained the fulndfe of diuioity. Hereby ir iseuident,thattbecanon of iheMa!Te for Tranfubflantiation,or reall 90o.ycares,was ncucr held to bee meant of Tranfubllantiation, nor wastherein all that prefence. time any moutbly receiuing of ChriCh rruc body dreamed of: Befides,'Druthm•r,thatliued abolll rhe yeare 8oo. vndttllood the I rH· Fathers ·when they fpeake of wordsofrhecanon to befpoken of rhe fpirithe Supper, haue many anddiuers ruall changing of the bread into Chrifis boleatmes wb1ch may figni6e conuerfion. Am· dy,and the wine intohts blood. Forthefc are br•ft,M....d, S.cr•""-'"P·4dotb vfe the word C his words vpon rh1s place of Scripture [ad CfJnNtrjion: and iih.de iis quim]fltriU initiantHr, taking thecup,Mat.zG.] Thusthe Lordcomcap.9.1he rearme ofmutation. AndCJpria• de maunded vs to doe, changing fpiritually the ca:nafaid,the bread is [mu/A/114)changed,not bread into his body, and the wine into his in lbape,but in narure, Origmagain!l Ce/jHI, blood,tbat by thefe twowe might rcmemb<r t.b.S. faith, that thebread by prayer !• made what hecd1d for vs,concerning his body and (fitri]rhe body,AudGaudmri•uTrailat.i. dt blood, AndAmalariu•abouuheyeare 8:o. Exodo,faith, that of the bread is made [<ffic•] vndcrfiandeth tbe words of the canon with· rhe body,and of thewine rhe blood. Euf•h•· our citberTranfubllantiation, or reall pre· "'€mi[Jmus,hom.s.d<Pa(.faith,that the priefi fence,l.~.dt uci.offic.cop.>s. AndWa/fiid.c.p. by afecret power cloth conuert [c•n•ertm] 16. After rhefolcnmities oftile olde Palfcothe vilible creatures intothefubfiance ofthe uer,he dcliuered theSacramenli ofhis body body andbloodofChri!l. Andagaine,that and blood,in the fubfianccsofbread a.: w'ine, rhe bread dorh patfe[trAnprt] into thenature and taught vs.to celebrate them in memorle • of the Lords body. Anfelme,<piffoi.Jec.,.p.& of his paffion. N iut.u {ho.•i•w,Th•f••r.lio. ang.Dom.faith,that rhc bread dotb[migr•rt] 4· writing agamfithe A[c•drugi, thatwo4ld gointo the bodie :AndFulbertsll,tpifl..JB•· not haue myficries reprefented in corporall rt•garium,Caith,rhat itis transfufed [rr••if••· D things,fai.th,That theinOitution,whcnn our di. J Algtrw,/.deSAcrAm.Cairh,that it isrransSauiour vfed bread and wine forthefaluati· ferred and tranfpofed [tra!Jci & ITAnifmi] in· on and r<formarion ofruankindc corrupted, ro thebody. But the auncientD~Clors,whcn was not fuch as wanted bodily thing•.Wherthey doefpeake of this change and conuerfifore the Fathers when they fpeake of the on of the bread,do meanethechange of the changing of rhe nature of the bread, doe vfe &condition of the bread, and not of the mean thechageof theproptiety only,wherfob!lance. And therefore in the reading of byofbodily fullcnance, by the powerof the them, wee mufi dillinguHh the facramentall dcity,itis made afood forthe foule. mutation ofrhefe figne• in fignifxingand fea· 1 In ancient times it was the whole vniuerhng,from a fub!lanriall mutation. And wee fall and orrhodoxall conCent of the Church, ought to hold directly, thatrhey neuer knew that that very bread which Chnfi broke, (& of rranfub!lantiation [ '""""'] for a.t Jcafr notany other thingvndcr rhc 6gurcofbread, ' 8co yeares after Chrill, but rather condem· was his body. And this i01he dodrine oflrt· ne<lit. Cypr~a• (orwhofoeuet wasthe author n.tUJ, lHjline MArtyr, Tertnlli4n, (JPrittn, Theuof the Sermon, dl' cana) faith, bread rcraidorrt, ChrJfoflom<, Am6r•f-· and A.:!!.!:fli~e.• And
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=