1P/edam fafti); touch more may it do fo, if Chriftians war- fhip a Trinity which is not.In that of the Calf, as they meant ir, there was only error in modo, for they intended not to terminate their Wor- fhip in the Calf but in God, as appears by their own words, To morrow ú a feafi to 7eho- -ah, Exod. 32. 5.. But in this of a Suppofiti- tious Trinity, there is error in objeelo ultimo, which is more provoking to God. If the Tri- nity be but the Idol of the brain, God will no more be enquired of by its Worshippers than he would by thofe who fet up their Idols in their heart, Ezek. 14.3. no gracious returns are found in fuck a falle way. A Believer there - fore,who in Wor fhipping one God in Trinity, frnds return's frequently and fucceffively after Duties from the Mercy-feat, carries an inward feal and proof in his bofom, that there is a /rinity. This experimental proof of a Trinity feems" to me evident in many places of Scrip- ture. St. John faith, Truly our fellorrfhip is with the Father and with hits Son jefas Ghriíf, r Job. s.3. He faith not barely,Our fellowfhip is with God, but with the Father and the Son ; neither loth he fay it at peradventures, but as a Pure known thing, fuch as Bath the joy of the holy Spirit with ir. St. Paul would have the Colof flans to be knit together in leve,and unto all richer of the full a,ztrance of underjianding to the ac- knowledgment of the My/lery of God, and of the Father and of Chri t, Cola a, 2. Here is a Piero- thory òf underílanding. nay, riches, and all íichef of it ; Ílere is O: tr.; which is, as one
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=