goo SCR. IL. The Cup of 137ePirtg. us, the bread and wine, the outward dements, which God path fan tified to that.purpofe. The third , is the adopting or fitting thefe elements for filch an end 5 and that is by fan tifying them, by blc°faing them, by ferting them apart ; The Cup of Bl /ing which we bleffe, &c. The pointwe delivered was this , that in the Sacra - ment there is a reall and true Communion of the body and bloud of Chrift to every Receiver. Wee told you the difference betweene thePapif}s and us, we both agree that Chrift is really in the Sacra- ment, they fay it is corporally, we fay it is only done by faith. But to rife an exprcffion ofc4uguffine,which he bath uponthe very Text, faith he, lohn Bspti/I laid he was not Fliaa, and yet Chrift faith ,lohn was Eli,: faith he how pig we reconcile theta two ? they are thhrs re conciled; lohn eaks preperly,and Chrift Make figuratively, and therefore they cro¡je not one another (he gives this very inflance) fo faith he, when Chrift faith, 7hrsismy body , and we fay it is not his body , but bread , ( they v4ag. are c 1uguflines owne words ) faith he, the meaning is this , It is the body , if we take it figuratively, and it is not his body , if we fpeake properly .; fo that as it was with the Temple of his body, when he fpake alit 1 will de/Ira y this Temple, and build it in threea/ayes; f they underf}ood it of the materiali Temple ; and, faith the Text, They were reckoned as falfe witneff es againfl Chrift : So when Chrift fpeakes thus of his body, This is my body , when they underlood it materially and corporally, when it is a thing fo frequent and ufuall with him to fpeake Metaphorically , I fay , they frail bee found falle witncifes againft him, in applying .0.9111i
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=