~ t' Tht Trial and · SEll 19 P.reffed under a heavy Load of Sheaves, Amos 1i. 13. and fo is punifhed with everlafting Punilhment : Hence there is a twofold Guilt, one fundamental, potential, reatus Gulp~ ; the Guilt of fin as fin, this is all one with fin, being the very Eifence, Soul, and formal being of Sin, and this Guilt of fin you cannot remove from fin, fo as fin "" :fhall remain fin, take this away, and you take away !in itfelh But this is removed in SanCtification as perfetl:ed, not in J uftification. As all the Arguments of DoClor CrifP. go along in their firength, to pmve that the Gutlt offin, Reat11s cutpt£, the fundamental Guilt offin, and nn itfelf are all one : So we lhall ~ield all to him, but with no Gain to his bad Caufe: For .7ofeph,s 13rethren fay, Gen. xlii. 22. 'Iruty we finned, Yer~ peccantes, nos foper f"ratrem no{trum ; or -were guilty againfl oztr :Brother: This is nothing, but we trefpaifed againft our Brother ; this I S not fpoken io much of Guilt, as offin itfelf: And the MalefaClor, faying, he is not guilty, meaneth of fundemental Guilt, or the Guilt of fin, and that he hath not cor1,1mitted the Crime charged upon him.. But there is another Guilt in fin, caH'- c::d Reatus p9Jnte, reatus perfonte, reatus aflualis, the Guilt or Obligation to 'Punijbment, the aflztt!ll Guilt, or a6lual Obti~ation of the Perfon "t.t'ho lktth finned, to Ptmijhment ; and this Guflt is a • Thing far different from £n itfelf, and is fepara- • ble from ftn, and may be, and is removed from .fin, without the Deftruelion of the Eifence of fin, an~ isfu~ly _re~oved in Juftification :- Now that thts Gutlt 1s chfferent from fin : I prove, ' · Becaufe that whi,h our bleifed futety•took u~n him for our Caufe, without takil'lg to him any Thing . which
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=