278 A Commentary upon theGo((ml Chap.7. F,om.14. Q. Avis molar fie, 11)4tos baba & liniá'is fæpé .blarisper ina- nia(el:bratr,u bila;ne levc'a!a- ram remigiun precipitentfls bra ventoru:n, sr. prrter ares. mota ali a, e- tiam babetur ex 9cr pruraipja. lib.z c,a. de verbo Dei. Prsmijin de re- r»ìttendis pecca. vie qui cOnf- tentur Deo non videtur ulla ex- tare in divinis litetïa. B llar. deju/tif.l. I. c. 2I. Cade of th^ Ghurch.2,47, B. Mortons ap peal,lib a. cap.a,. fPg.I 2 Thef'.z. $ rv:us 'Georg. ltb,e, he cannot difpute, yet he cats die ( as that Martyr Paid ) in de- fence of the truth , whereof he is fully perfwádcd in his own minde, bottomed upon the Scriptures, and ballafted therewith, as S. Atnbrofe faith the B:e is with a little ltone, that the be not blown away with the winde, 2. Secondly, Truth is (ingle, one and the fame, at agreement with it f 1f. But errour is manifold, diff inant, and contradi5cry to it fclf. flowoften Both Bedlatr- mine deny that in one place , that he had affirmed in anotht ? That the Scripture is the vcry word'cf God, faith he, it can by nomeansbe afford out of Scripture. But in another difcourf ( forgetting what he had faid) he affirmeth , that among other argumentsof the Divinity of the Scriptures, there is fufficient proofto be had cut of the Scriptures thesr.fclves : So, he cannot bethink hicnfelf (ifyou'! believe him) where in all holy Writ, there is any promife made ofpardon oftins to filch asconfèff them to Goa. Again, he teacheth that the fubfiance of the bread in the Sacrament, is not turned into the fubflance of Chrifls body proddaivè, as one thing is madeof another : but that the bread goes away, and :hrilts body cometh into the room of it addu- elivè, asone thing fucceeds into the place of another, the fit ft be. in voided. And this, faith he, is the opinionof the Church of Rome, himfelfbeing Reader of controverfies at Ronte. But Sua- rez, Reader at Salamanca in Spain confutes Bellarminei opinic it terming it Trarflocation, not Tranfubßantiation; and faith it is not theChurches opinion. So thegreateft Popi!h Clerks can- not determine how the Saints know our hearts and praiers : whe- ther byhearing, or feeing, cr prcfence every where, or by Gods relating, or revealing mens praiers and needs onto them. All > which waits Tome ofthem hold as poflible or probable, and o- thers_deny them, andconfute therm as untrue. Thus thefe great mafîer- builders are confounded in their language, and thus hard it isto know what voce Church Malignant holdeth : Her own deareft and learnedeff. formes know not; God having delivered them up to the efficacy oferrour, which facts as a gan- grene, and fpreds as leaven, iòwring the whole lump. Look how the heathens were at a meer uncertainty in their opinions and devotions ; as theMarriners in orahprai'd to their fevera 1 Gods, and bad himdoe likewife. Othersofthem ufually clafed up their praiers with DO, Diaók omnes. Left haply they might ar fiake in any : fo arc l-lrrtgtcks. HaPving once llept ever the f-
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=