[ 91 ] Schoolmen ; than with , the Protefiants in his attempt to reconcile our Articles to their Do.– ctrine. Dr. Morley Bi!hop ofWinchefler tells us~ Tha:t in his Conference with the Jefuit F. Darcy, he .would have drawn him to t~em, by pe~fwading · him that they are not unreconcileable but can abate us many things ; P. 5. [The Ftifher repiied, ' that perhaps we {hoftld not find ,them fo ft~'f in alt · , , , 'Points : for in things of Pojitive and Ecclefiaftical 'e.cmfiitution only, the Church might in order to Chri– ' ftian Peace alter fomething which foe had before 'Eftablijhed; and ~e doubted not but foe would: ' And his Inftances were, the Latine Service, the Sa– ~ crament under one Specie.s , and ,the Ctelibate of 'Priefis; But AS for Matters of f'aith, they cottld n~t ' afrer or abate any thing, in{tancing in the Point of ' the Churches lnfallibiliiy. / And this is their ordinary Opinion , a:nd yet· they would not grant the Cup to the Bohemians, and to this day the Churches Peace bath not prevailed witH them fox fuch Alterations as they · fay are in their Powe.r. · What of this Kind they offered in the Treaty with Archbifhop Laud we iliall fee after. The Book called The Cathotick Moderator, goeth this way. . But no man hath attempted ir with fo much ability of Judgment and Succefs of late as Hugo Grotius ~ in his Votttm Pro Pace , Confultatio and ·Notes on Caj]ander, his Annotations on the Reve– lations, and De Antichrifto,and his Writings againfi: Rivet. . The Dutch dealt hardly with him as an Arminian, and Judged him to perpetual Impri– fonment, (when theyhad not fuch another I\1an aS'long ..
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=