TheCowrENTs; MBlak'sfrfi drgunoent ftVered. Argiment 2. 4nfivered. Argument 3. Argument 4. Argument 5. 4nd6. p.53 P.55 P.57 p.63 p.64 Difputation 1. nether Workj are a conditionof condition of Qua, fi7etodfibiyfiztriekns,:fnudfok awchoent condition? pep- The terms [workv and luflificAtion ] explained. p.70,7t The TermCondition explained. plz The Truth laid down in feveral Propolitions. P.75 Negattveand Affirmative The main Propofittonproved. p.79, Cteft. Can Chriji be 14nrumental in jtellifYing. ap123:8C4 Qua. DadChrifi expiate the fins, that by theGe4e1 menare obliged to petniAmentfor ? p.86 Of Repentance, and the habit of Faith in iteflificationa'p. 85, 86 Cklett. Doth the Goffrel jullifie NJ ? p.86,87,88,89 Other points brieflydifcufed. p90 TheOpponents'kiting of the aueltion. pp.9971.fos';96olc Divers onjull charges repelled. Hon, Abraham ry p.10I O : asjaftified, debated to The Opponents Thefts and Arguments. AlkWorks make not the Reward to be not of grace, proved by fix Arguments. p.III,to I15. And by Expo-. 'ital.,. Hiffecond Argument from thedifference pot betWeenfaithanì other Graces in Jugh.Pation. p la The cafe of faiths loeseren °pumaby4fialilit41e. p.i 20 HA- thirdArgument confidered : Our fill ?unification hotly, dffis.,.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=