( 147 ) Henry PowUs in, his Book of Popifh rreafons, bath fo largely proved, by citing the exprefs words of their chief Dotors, jefuits, Dominicans and others, that this is their ordinary affertion, that I muff remit the Reader thither for full fatisfadion beyond all denyal. , I briefly refer you but to the words ofLearned Suarez adverf. lea. Ang1. i. 6. Cap. 4. fea. 14. and cap. 6. felt. 22.24. Azorius Inflit. Mor. part.1.1. 8.c.i;. AndDom. Bannes in `Thom. 22. q. 12. a. 2. faith [" when there is " evident knowledg ofthe crime, subjects may lawfully ex- «empt themfelves from the Power of their Princes, be- " fore any declaratory, fentence of a judge, fo they have << but (irength to do it.] [Hence it followeth that the faithful (Papifts) of England and Saxonie are to be ex- " cufed, that do not free themfelves from the Power of "their Superiours, nor make war againft them: becaufe " commonly they are not flrong enough, to manage thole wars : andgreat dangers hangover them. So then, the difability of thePapiffs is all the fecurity we can hope for from them. .Augu nine 7riumphus faith (de poteft. Eccl. q. 46. a. 2.) There is no doubt but the Pope may depofe all Kings, when " there is reafonable .caufefor it. Part of saarez words are (Defenf. lid. cath.1.6. c. 4. §. 14.) [" After fentence he is altogether deprived of his " Kingdom, ° fo that he cannotbyjug title pofofs it : '"here- " fore from thence-forward he may be handled frs a veer " tyrant, and confequently anyprivate man maykill him. I have elfewhere citedcard. Perrons words out of Bi- íhop Ujher profeffing that, if the Pope may not depofe Kings, it will follow -that he is Ástichrift_who bath fo long profiled it: I °grant theconfegi eiice. XVIIL the.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTcyMjk=